If you asked ten different performance marketers for their honest opinion on brand search, you would likely get twelve different answers.
It is one of the most debated topics in the industry. It is also a source of constant anxiety for B2B business owners.
The central question is simple. Should you pay for clicks when a user is already searching for your name?
On the surface, it feels counterintuitive.
If someone types your business name into Google, they are clearly looking for you.
Logic dictates they will click your organic listing if you just leave them alone. Paying for that click feels like setting money on fire.
It feels like paying for something you already own.
But the reality of Google Ads is rarely that simple.
The platform is not designed to be fair. It is designed to be profitable for Google and competitive for you.
In this episode of the podcast, Maelien and I decided to tackle this head-on. We unpack the real reasons behind using branded search in B2B advertising, how to stop competitors from stealing your leads, and why your reporting might be lying to you.
What is branded search in B2B advertising?
Before we dive into the strategy, we need to be crystal clear on what we are discussing.
Branded search refers to any search query that includes your unique business name or variations of it.
If you run an accountancy firm called “Numerico”, the search landscape looks like this:
- Non-branded search: A user types in “accountants for small business” or “tax advisors”. They are looking for a service. They do not care who provides it yet. They are in the market, but they are brand agnostic.
- Branded search: A user types in “Numerico accountants” or “Numerico login”. They know exactly who you are. They have navigational intent. They want to find you specifically.
- Competitor search: A user types in the name of your rival followed by a service keyword.
Understanding this distinction is vital.
When you see a high volume of branded search traffic, it is usually a very positive signal. It means your market awareness is high. People know who you are.
However, we need to be honest about where that traffic comes from.
Branded search in B2B advertising is rarely a source of new demand. It is a signal. It is a lagging indicator.
The demand was created elsewhere.
Perhaps a prospect saw your content on LinkedIn. Maybe they heard you on a podcast or saw a YouTube video. Perhaps they met your sales team at a conference.
The search itself is just the mechanism they use to find you again.
It is the digital equivalent of looking up a phone number in a directory after seeing a billboard.
This is why we say growth in branded search is excellent proof that your broader marketing system is working. But the search ad itself did not create the desire.
It merely captured it.
The B2B Performance Marketing Podcast
Subscribe to the B2B Performance Marketing Podcast for practical insights, zero fluff, and real results.

When to use branded search (and when not to)
If the demand already exists, why pay Google to capture it?
In an ideal world, I would tell you not to. I would tell you to rely entirely on your organic SEO listing and save that budget for cold traffic.
Unfortunately, we do not operate in an ideal world.
We operate in a competitive marketplace where your competitors are hungry for your market share.
The defensive play
The primary reason to run branded search in B2B advertising is defence.
Competitors can and will bid on your brand name.
It is a common tactic.
If I am your competitor, I know that people searching for your name are high-intent leads. They are ready to buy. They have done their research.
They are at the bottom of the funnel.
If I can place an ad right at the top of the search results that says “Alternative to [Your Brand]: Cheaper & Faster”, I might just steal that click.
This happens constantly. It is aggressive, but it is allowed.
As Maelien mentioned in the episode, this practice is becoming increasingly common.
If you do not run a branded campaign, you leave that top slot wide open. You are effectively rolling out the red carpet for your rivals to intercept your prospects at the final hurdle.
By bidding on your own name, you block that slot.
You ensure that when someone looks for you, they find you.
There is also a mathematical advantage here. Google uses a metric called Quality Score to determine how much you pay per click.
Because you are the brand owner, your relevance for your own name is 10/10.
This means you pay pennies for these clicks. Your competitors, however, have low relevance. Their Quality Score will be low. This means they have to pay a massive premium to show up on your name.
By running a brand campaign, you force them to pay that premium. You make it expensive for them to attack you.
Capitalising on viral spikes
There is another scenario where branded search becomes essential. This is during moments of high visibility.
If you launch a viral marketing campaign, get featured in major press, or run a heavy influencer push, your branded search volume will spike.
The people searching during these spikes are often different from your usual traffic. They might have only heard your name five minutes ago.
Their intent is fresh, but their loyalty is low.
They are curious, but they are easily distracted.
In these moments, you want to control the narrative completely. You want to ensure they land on a specific page that matches the message they just heard.
If you rely on organic search, they might land on your homepage.
That might be fine.
But what if they land on a generic blog post? Or worse, what if a competitor spots the spike in volume and starts bidding on your name immediately?
In these specific instances, we recommend leaning hard into branded spend until the hype dies down. You need to capture that lightning in a bottle before it escapes.
The B2B Performance Marketing Podcast
Subscribe to the B2B Performance Marketing Podcast for practical insights, zero fluff, and real results.

Branded search attribution in performance marketing
This is where things get messy. Attribution is the silent killer of honest reporting.
Because branded traffic is so high-intent, it converts at a very high rate. The Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) on branded campaigns is usually incredibly low.
This creates a temptation for marketers and agencies.
If I lump your branded results in with your non-branded results, my overall performance looks fantastic. I can show you a blended CPA that looks very efficient.
But this is misleading. It is vanity metrics at their worst.
The “net new” fallacy
You cannot conscientiously claim a branded search enquiry as “net new” business generated by the search channel.
As we discussed, that user was likely activated by something else.
If you use a “last-click” attribution model, the branded search ad takes 100% of the credit for the sale. The LinkedIn post that actually convinced them to buy gets zero credit.
This skews your decision-making.
You might look at the data and see that LinkedIn has a high CPA and Search has a low CPA. The logical decision seems to be cutting the LinkedIn budget and moving it to Search.
This creates a death spiral.
You turn off the demand source (LinkedIn). Suddenly, fewer people know who you are. Fewer people search for your brand.
Your “efficient” search channel dries up.
You have cut off the supply of demand to feed the efficiency engine.
Honest reporting
You must report on branded search in B2B advertising separately.
Your monthly report should have a clear line for “Brand” and a clear line for “Non-Brand” or “Generic”.
This allows you to see the truth.
- Brand campaign: Tells you how well your reputation is holding up. It tells you if your other marketing channels are creating demand.
- Non-brand campaign: Tells you how effective your advertising is at generating new business from cold audiences.
If you blend them, you are flying blind. You are hiding your inefficiencies behind your brand reputation.
We often see agencies report a “Blended ROAS” (Return on Ad Spend).
Be very wary of this.
If the majority of that return comes from people who were already going to buy, the agency is not adding value. They are just taxing your existing customers.
Setting budgets for branded search campaigns
So, how much money should you actually give Google for your own name?
My philosophy is simple. Spend as little as possible.
This might sound contradictory after I just told you it is a necessary defence. But remember, the goal is defence. The goal is not expansion.
I want the bulk of my client’s budget going towards non-brand search. I want to generate leads that would not have come in otherwise. That is where the net benefit lies.
You should not have an “unlimited” budget for brand just because the ROAS looks good. You should have a capped budget that is sufficient to cover the available impressions.
The “Target Impression Share” Strategy
We often use a specific bidding strategy for brand campaigns called “Target Impression Share”.
Most search campaigns use “Maximize Conversions” or “Target CPA”. These strategies tell Google to find the most likely buyers.
For brand search, we do not need Google to find buyers. We know everyone searching our name is a potential buyer.
Instead, we use Target Impression Share. We tell Google: “Ensure our ad appears at the very top of the page 100% of the time.”
This keeps the budget efficient. We only spend what is necessary to maintain that top position.
If competitors back off, our costs go down. If competitors get aggressive, the system bids up just enough to keep them at bay. It is an automated defence system.
Watch out for Performance Max
This is the biggest pitfall we see in accounts right now.
Performance Max (PMax) is Google’s automated campaign type. It uses AI to find conversions across all of Google’s inventory. This includes YouTube, Display, Gmail, Discover, and Search.
PMax loves branded search.
Why? Because it wants to get you conversions at the lowest cost. The easiest way for the AI to do that is to go after people who are already searching for you.
We often audit accounts where the business thinks their PMax campaign is a genius lead generator. They see 50 leads a month at a remarkably low cost.
When we look under the hood, we see that it is simply cannibalising their branded traffic. It is capturing people who were typing in the business name.
It is a brand campaign in disguise.
To prevent this, you must manually exclude your brand terms from your Performance Max campaigns.
You have to force the system to go out and find new people. You have to tell the AI that “easy wins” are not allowed. It forces the algorithm to work harder for your money.
If you do not do this, your PMax campaign will look successful while your actual business growth stagnates.
The B2B Performance Marketing Podcast
Subscribe to the B2B Performance Marketing Podcast for practical insights, zero fluff, and real results.

Real-world lessons from SaaS and B2B accounts
We saw a perfect example of this recently with a B2B SaaS company we work with.
When we audited their account, one search campaign stood out. It had an incredibly low cost per demo. It looked like the star performer. The marketing manager was thrilled with it.
We dug into the search terms report.
Over 95% of the traffic in that “performance” campaign was actually branded search.
People were searching for the software by name. They were typing in things like “[Software Name] pricing” or “[Software Name] login”.
The campaign was not generating new interest. It was simply taxing existing interest.
By stripping those brand terms out and moving them to a dedicated brand campaign, the picture changed instantly. The “star” campaign’s performance dropped significantly because it was forced to rely on generic keywords.
This looked bad on paper. The cost per lead went up. The volume went down.
But it was the truth.
Once we knew the truth, we could actually fix the generic campaign to make it work. As long as the brand traffic was hiding the failure, we would never have improved the account.
We were able to reallocate budget to keywords that actually brought in new people. Six months later, the business was growing faster because they were acquiring net new customers, not just recycling old ones.
Using Auction Insights
Another tool we rely on is the Auction Insights report.
This is a diagnostic tool inside Google Ads that tells you who else is bidding in the same auctions as you.
On your brand campaign, this report is a goldmine.
It shows you exactly which competitors are bidding on your name. It tells you their “Impression Share”. This metric reveals how often they show up compared to you.
If you see a competitor creeping up the list with a high impression share, you know they are aggressively targeting your brand.
That is your signal.
It is a signal to review your ad copy. If a competitor is bidding on you, make sure your ad copy reinforces why you are the better choice. Use your ad extensions to show social proof. Highlight your ratings and reviews.
Make sure that even if they are present, you are dominant.
The psychology of the click
There is one final aspect to consider. It is the psychology of the user.
Why do users click ads instead of organic listings?
Sometimes, it is simply convenience. The ad is the first thing they see. On mobile devices, the ad can take up the entire screen. The organic listing might be below the fold.
If you do not have an ad there, the user has to scroll to find you. In that split second of scrolling, they might see a competitor’s ad.
You are removing friction.
By paying for the brand click, you are ensuring the smoothest possible path for the user. You are also able to control the landing page.
Organic listings usually link to the homepage. With a paid ad, you can direct users to a specific offer, a demo page, or a new product launch. You have control over the destination.
This control is worth paying for, provided the price is right.
Summary: A necessary evil
To wrap this up, think of branded search in B2B advertising as insurance.
You do not want to pay for it. In a perfect world, you wouldn’t have to. But the risk of not having it is too high.
Competitors will take your traffic if you let them. They will siphon off your hard-earned demand.
The secret is to treat it with intent.
- Separate it: Put brand keywords in their own campaign. Never mix them with generic terms.
- Exclude it: Make sure brand terms are blocked from PMax and generic campaigns. Use negative keyword lists liberally.
- Minimise it: Spend only what is needed to defend the top spot. Use Target Impression Share to automate this.
- Report it: Never blend brand data with cold traffic data. Be honest about where your leads come from.
If you follow these rules, you will protect your brand. You will defend your territory. And most importantly, you will stop fooling yourself about your marketing performance.
Marketing is a system. Brand search is just one part of that system. Treat it as the safety net, not the engine, and you will be fine.
FAQs
Q: What is branded search in B2B advertising?
A: Branded search refers to paid ads triggered when users search for your company’s name or brand-specific terms in Google.
Q: Should B2B brands bid on their own keywords?
A: Yes, especially as a defensive strategy to prevent competitors from hijacking your traffic or brand demand.
Q: What’s the difference between branded and non-branded search?
A: Branded search targets your company’s name, while non-branded focuses on generic or category-level terms.
Q: How much should you spend on branded search campaigns?
A: Ideally, as little as possible, just enough to defend your brand name from competitor bids and keep reporting clean.
Q: How should branded search be reported in performance marketing?
A: Separate branded from non-branded in reports and avoid last-click attribution, which can overstate branded campaign impact.




